#Super bowl streaker bet free#

Perez, Andrade placed a 50,000 bet with Bovada, an offshore sports book, on a prop bet that someone would get on the field during the game. All he had to do was keep his mouth shut and he would have been a legend.Īt least we got the Kevin Harlan call out of this clown show. Advertisement Super Bowl streaker tries to collect 375K bet but gets shut down by sports book. As the game progressed through its fourth quarter, things briefly came to a halt when.

#Super bowl streaker bet free#

Ultimately, it looks as though Andrade's plan to bet on himself won't end up in the big payday that he had hoped for, but it appears he came closer to success than many initially suspected.Īs mentioned, everybody originally thought this was a scheme by a pornsite to get some free publicity so maybe Yuri hedged his bet on himself by whoring himself out for the ad as well? Or he was just wetting his beak twice?Įither way, kid's a fucking moron and I have zero sympathies for him losing out on $374,000 because he has nobody to blame but himself. Super Bowl streaker Yuri Andrade is claiming to have won 374,000 (271,500) after betting on Sunday's stunt. Perez wrote that one bettor who said he had no prior knowledge of the stunt had already had his account shut down by Bovada. Perez at Front Office Sports, Bovada was working to identify accounts that knew of Andrade's planned stunt.Īccording to Perez, Bovada is refunding those that wagered there would not be a fan on the field during the game and paying out winning bets for accounts that were not linked to early knowledge of Andrade's plan. With several smaller wagers rather than one big $50,000, it's more conceivable that Andrade could have gotten a healthy wager down on his run.Īccording to a report from A.J. They bet that there would be a fan on the field at +750 odds. Meanwhile, Andrade and friends had placed a bet on the odds of a streaker showing up at the game with offshore agency Bovada and were primed to profit 375,000, NJ.com explains. The moral of the story? If you’re ever able to rig an event and rip off a sportsbook, maybe keep it to yourself – and in the case of the pink thong clad Super Bowl streaker – keep it in your pants.But despite initial suspicions, it appears that there was some truth to Andrade's claim, though he still won't be cashing in on his run.Īndrade told a Tampa radio station that he had gotten friends to place wagers from different accounts on the gambling site Bovada. These claims have yet to be verified but Bovada’s actions seem to indicate there is at least some validity to the original story. The irregularity could have been Andrade alerting friends that we was going to conduct the stunt, giving them the opportunity to make unfair max bets, and he recently confirmed on a Florida radio station that’s exactly what he did. For example, Bovada has said that the maximum bet you could make on that Super Bowl prop was $1,000 - a considerably less amount than Andrade’s alleged $50K bet. Lastly, most major online sportsbooks don’t take large prop bets. There is no box score category for streakers. Contrary to his belief, Vegas sportsbooks’ prop bets only deal with statistics that you can find in a box score. Secondly, he mentioned that he placed the wager at a Las Vegas sportsbook. However, the official police report stated that it was actually $500. How Legitimate was Andrade’s Bet?Īs mentioned on US Gambling Sites on Tuesday, t here are some discrepancies when it comes to Andrade’s story.įirst of all, he originally said that he had to pay $1,000 for bail after he was arrested for a misdemeanor trespassing charge. There is no word as to what Bovada’s definition of an “irregularity” is, but it’s to be assumed that it could be anyone who bet an unusually high amount on this prop bet who may have had inside information. “We’ll be reaching out to all those players impacted by this event shortly.” “Additionally, we’re honoring all those ‘YES’ wagers we’ve determined to have had no part in the betting irregularities.” “All of our players are on a level playing field, so if you bet ‘NO’ on this market we’re going to refund your bet,” Bovada added in their statement. However, Bovada wanted to do right by their bettors in ensuring that everyone feels like they’re on an even playing field. The odds for the ‘NO’ option fluctuated leading up to the Super Bowl on Bovada, reaching as high as +750. ? We identified some betting irregularities on our Super Bowl prop ‘Will A Fan Run Onto The Field During The Game?’ ?